Unpack my primary case of cameras and lenses, clean lenses, check CF cards — 6-16 gig cards; 8-8 gig cards, check cameras (3 primary, 5D/5DMarkII; 2 back up, 1DMKII), time sync all bodies so the photos can be put later into sequence without tearing out my hair.  Put camera batteries on charge.  Repack case.

Open lighting case, pull out all gear, pack new umbrellas purchased on Thursday, re-pack all stuff, charge flash batteries, wait, wait, wait for batteries to charge.  Charge more batteries.  Wait, wait, wait.  Pull out all Pocket Wizards and check.  Charge batteries….  Pace.  Look out window, raining, dang.  Think about all the shots I want to take after ceremony.  Bring out another camera case and pack more gear — tilt / shift lenses; super speed lenses, macro lenses.  Look out window, not raining.  Yeah!  Put more batteries on charge.  Wait, wait, wait, pace.  Quadruple check directions to brides house.  Check Google Maps for umpteenth time.  Pace.  Think about lighting for group shots, reception, etc.  Pack stands in car.  Charge more batteries (you can never have enough of those things).  Add some last minute items to my Bride Emergency Kit (more on that later).  Pull change from pocket (don’t need change rattling around at a wedding.  Toss change in piggy bank.  Pace some more.  Zip up main camera case after one last check.  Zip up secondary camera case.  Unzip secondary camera case, add one more item.  Re-zip and set in line for packing into car.  Charge last four batteries.  Check lighting kit.  Again.  Finally ready for packing in car.  Open up all cases, just once more before leaving…

Obsessive?  Yeah, it is, but once I leave the studio I’m committed to doing the job with nothing more than I have with me so I must to be as careful (obsessive) as possible not to forget that simple looking widget that could spell the difference between an awesome shot and no shot.

Hope you enjoyed my prep.  Now I must go and pace some more…

But banning Photoshop?  To me, that’s ignorant.  So, what it seems now is to stop people from over using the technology we should just stop using our digital darkrooms completely and hand in pictures straight out of camera.  Hellllooooo, has anyone seen what digital images look like straight out of the box?  Flat, dull, blah.  And that’s putting it mildly.  Images need to be processed to bring out the proper color, vibrancy, contrast and tone.  Some areas of the photo need to be dodged and others burned.  Maybe the contrast is too much so it needs to be reduced, maybe it’s too little and needs to be increased.  These are things now outlawed, at least at McClelland’s magazine.

Yes, it’s true, people have overused the available technology.  Back in the 70′s photographers would burn the corners of photos in the darkroom to absolute black.  It was called “The Hand of God.”  And yes, it looked as silly at times as the leisure suites of the day.  It was not groovy.  but it was the “technology” available at the time.

Skip up  to the dawn of digital.  Photographers scanned their film, usually color negative for the working class news photographer.  Then we sent it off to the digital tech who employed a massive machine (Pre-Photoshop) to tweak the image.  At that time it was a joke around the industry that some papers (who used color photos) always had bright blue skies.  The Orange County Register in California was a chief culprit.  Someone even coined a phrase for it, “Register Blue.”  All was well in sunny Southern California until one day their was a situation — an accident with a car in a swimming pool was photographed and the well meaning digi tech made sure the sky AND the pool water was brilliant Register Blue.  Only the pool wasn’t blue.  Something was released in the water turning it bright red.  With well meaning intent the digi tech severely altered the news value of the photograph by turning the actual red water to a “natural” blue.  Oops.  The public caught them with their hands squarely in the cookie jar and the world has never been the same.

It about control.  Control over the tone, color, contrast to make the image stand on its own vs. self-control by the photographer / digital tech / art director / designer to keep from going too far into another realm — photo illustration.  Photoshop makes it easy to do “just a little more” to enhance and elevate the image to something beyond it’s intended meaning.  It’s easy to layer, add beams of light, spot light certain areas, darken sections, eliminate distracting elements, or add more elements than were present at the moment of exposure.  Subject blinked?  No problem, we’ll clone the eyes from another frame, or we’ll just chop off the heads and switch them around.  Someone step into the frame?  No problemo, swish, swish and they’re gong.  Oh, you want someone else in the background to “add” to the meaning, again no problem, cut cut paste paste and whamo! instant background element added.  Easy as pie.

At what point does honest enhancement become dishonest representation?  That’s the five million dollar question.  Some say if you could do it in the (wet) darkroom then it’s OK in the digital darkroom.  Not so fast there, what about the work of  Jerry Ulsmann?  He does photo constructions seamlessly in the wet darkroom.  If Ulsmann’s work wasn’t fantasy based you probably couldn’t tell it was altered.  Guess that yardstick is broken.

My vote is, as it has always been, for common sense and honesty.  If you are adding or subtracting elements to the image then stop, that’s dishonest.  Bumping contrast, dodging or burning a little, fine.  I really think everyone knows via common sense when it goes to far.  Whether image handlers employ that most uncommon sense of common sense is a matter of character.  Some, the dishonest ones, will always take it to the extreme to beat the competition or elevate their own skills as an image maker.  Then again, some people will always use guns for wrongdoing, too.  Photoshop doesn’t kill images, people do.

If you want to read the full article from the BBC you can find it here.

The best storyteller in the business

Most unusual show at the fair, and most interesting, too.  This fellow played the bells.  Not those little bell choir twinkle bells, tho, we’re talking huge brass bells weighing into the tons!  The sound was incredible.  This is worth visiting the fair all by itself.

WARNING — kids, do NOT try this at home (or anywhere else!)  And by kids I mean anyone under the age of 90.

A good old fashion joust completed the days events

And if the joust doesn’t get them, the swords will

And so, after a lovely day at the fair we bid our new friends adieu until next time.  The Festival runs through the beginning of October so their is still some time to visit.  We big kids had a great time, you will too.

Photographic notes:  All images were made hand held with a Canon 5D and a 100 mm Canon macro lens, ISO 400.  Images were processed exclusively in Adobe Lightroom and are presented here full frame.

For contract reasons I can’t show images from the job just yet, but here are some additional images I shot of one of our models, Michael Goulis.  Mike has some great tats so after the client shots were in the bag I asked him if we could go off set to a corner window to knocked off a few frames.  If you’re interested in booking Mike for a shoot he works through The Talent Group.

 All in all it was a great job thanks to an awesome crew, terrific talent and very cool clients.  Can’t wait to do it all again, thanks guys!